Charlie Kirk’s Assassination: Whodunit?
By
Substack.com
Ever since the assassination of
President Kennedy in 1963, scores of Americans have
learned to mistrust “official stories” that seem
designed to conceal a passel of conspirators by
pointing to a single “lone wolf” shooter as the
perpetrator—someone we’ve learned to consider as a
“lone wolf patsy.”
That is why the internet is
percolating with citizen sleuths investigating the
murder of Charlie Kirk.
In the meantime, we’ll soon see
if Trump’s FBI is worth its salt. The good news is
they are investigating a half dozen or more people
who clearly had prior knowledge of the murder based
on their online chat on Discord.
And I’m
assuming Kash Patel will also drag in the four
people from the TPUSA event that I’d want hauled in
first: the two staffers inside the tent who seemed
to be signaling via hand movements seconds before
the shot rang out; Hunter Kozak, the young man who
asked the question about transgender mass shootings
just before the shot; and the man who, right after
Charlie collapsed, pumped his fist high in a gesture
that echoed one of the alleged Discord chat room
posts: “We f---ing did it!”
THE OFFICIAL STORY
It was the kid on the roof with
a rifle. Sound familiar?
Only this time it was a Mauser
firing a .30-06 caliber bullet.
No sooner was it announced that
the shot hailed from a Mauser firing a .30-06
caliber bullet, than Citizen Sleuths with extensive
knowledge of firearms weighed in: Impossible.
Wrong angle, wrong bullet, wrong location. Among
the truth-seeking critics:
Alex Jones of Infowars;
Nate Cornacchia, retired Special Forces Green
Beret; former US Marine
Zeb Boylin—and scads of others who have firearm
expertise.
In a nutshell: they concur that
a .30-06 would have blown Kirk’s head off. Says
Boylin, a Marine Scout Sniper who taught ballistics
classes for five years: “The FBI’s lying. It’s quite
literally not possible for the shooter to have been
on the roof that they claim....”. And as Nate points
out, while guys like him posting on YouTube, etc.
are investigating bullet trajectories using “math
and Newtonian physics,” the FBI never even locked
down the crime scene—which, by the way, UVU
immediately paved over.
But here’s something everyone
can likely agree on:
There are astonishing parallels
to the attempted assassination of Trump in Butler,
Pennsylvania: a large public outdoor event; a lone
shooter up on an unsecured roof; the target shot at
while speaking to the crowd; major failures by an
incompetent or compromised security team.
It’s almost as if the real perpetrators,
whoever they may be, are saying to the President:
We may have missed you in Pennsylvania, but we’ve
just taken out your right-hand man in Utah.
It only took the FBI 33 hours
to track down Charlie Kirk’s alleged assailant, and
launch the official story, with Tyler Robinson named
as the patsy…I mean assassin.
THE PLOT THICKENS
It almost seems like a point of
pride for the FBI and assorted Deep Staters to
obfuscate mass shootings and assassinations whether
they gain anything by it or not. Why, for example,
did they need for Thomas Crooks to be the guilty
party in Butler, PA rather than Antifa member
Maxwell Yearick, whom a number of citizen sleuths
have outed as the sniper—at least one of them? Is it
that We the Peons never deserve the truth?
While Occam’s Razor may work as
a general principle when searching for the truth, it
may offer temptation to ignore complexities in cases
of high-profile attempted assassinations and mass
shootings in favor of simple answers that may
provide a sense of closure. However, since 1963, our
own government and media mouthpieces have cried
“lone wolf” so many times that most of us disbelieve
them now as a matter of course.
Clearly, there’s more to this
story than we’ve been led to believe
SOME REASONS TO DOUBT THE
OFFICIAL STORY
·
Impossibility it was a
.30-06 caliber bullet as that would have blown
Kirk’s head off
·
The fact that the gaping
wound on his neck was an exit wound
·
Necessity for the shot to
have come from behind Charlie and somewhat to the
right to account for the exit wound on his neck
·
Transgender shooting
question at the time of the kill shot
·
Nearby easily accessed
roofs of buildings were left unsecured
·
The odd behavior of his
security team including making hand signals seconds
prior to shot
·
Brian Harpole, the
security team owner, making finger movement as if
triggering a device at the very moment of the shot
·
Mystery Suspect doing
likewise with a two-handed movement, standing to
Charlie’s right
·
The fact that Brian
Harpole, owner of the security group, was smiling as
he mimed triggering some device
·
The fact that the
University immediately dug up the area where Kirk
was killed and paved over it
·
The fact that videographer
and investigative journalist Jason Goodman detected
drones at high altitudes in the airspace above the
crime scene, as in Butler, PA
· The fact that a Hades spy plane flew very nearby at low altitudes both before and after the shooting
POIROT INVESTIGATES BY PROXY
Clearly, there’s more to this story than we’ve been led to believe, so let’s begin by asking some questions.
Donning my Hercule Poirot
chapeau, the first thing I notice is, as Poirot was
wont to say, that there are too many clues. Why the
Antifa/transgender inscriptions on the bullet
casings? Why the question about transgender mass
shootings as Kirk was shot? Is it coincidental that
Tyler Robinson, the alleged killer, has a
“transitioning” transgender male-to-female lover?
Why the campus presence of the radical Leftwing
group Armed Queers of Salt Lake City? Why the
cheering of some in the audience when Charlie had
fallen?
Now all of that is real and
very troubling. But it’s also a narrative, and
perhaps a shade too pat under the circumstances.
After all, Poirot’s trademark modus operandi is to
seek out facts over narrative.
So now we need to consider two
main possibilities—make that three: either Tyler
Robinson, acting alone out of anger at Charlie
Kirk’s Christian stance against transgenderism, shot
and killed him; or Robinson acted in collusion with
members of the transgender community, some of whom
apparently had foreknowledge of the event; or a
deeper, more sinister and more elaborate conspiracy
has taken place.
And let’s begin with a new
premise: Let’s assume that the official story is not
only incorrect, but that it is deliberately
misleading. That way we can begin to look for the
opposite of what we’ve been told took place.
QUERYING THE OFFICIAL STORY
Why, for example, have we been
assured there was no exit wound?
Well, if there’s no exit wound
then the gaping hole in Charlie’s neck had to be the
entrance wound. That means the shot had to
come from Charlie’s left. So we’re going to
assume the shot came from the right.
Next: why the insistence that
the bullet was a badass .30-06 shot by a kid on an
unsecured rooftop 200 yards away, using with his
grandpa’s Mauser? For the moment, let’s consider the
kid and the Mauser and even the rooftop as window
dressing, and zero in on the bullet and the distance
involved.
We are asked to believe that
the shot came from far away—some 200 yards—and from
a bullet that can kill a moose, to explain the
damage to Charlie’s body.
So we’re going to assume the
opposite: A much smaller caliber bullet but
fired at very close range. This could
account for the lethality of the shot and the damage
to Charlie’s body.
These assumptions open up new
possibilities that we can now explore.
THE TWO-SHOT THEORY & JASON
GOODMAN’S EXPLANATION
If Kirk was shot at relatively
close range on his right side, how can we explain
the unmistakable sound of the loud crack-boom from a
high-powered rifle?
Enter the two-shot theory.
While many have considered the
need for two shots to pull off this baffling
assassination, Jason Goodman, professional
videographer turned investigative journalist and
digital sleuth extraordinaire, has painstakingly
unearthed evidence of the kill shot coming from
behind Kirk. According to this theory, which I find
very plausible, someone, whether Tyler Robinson from
a rooftop 200 yards away, or someone else in another
location, fired the shot we all heard—but it was not
the kill shot. The fatal shot was not supersonic but
subsonic, possibly via a silencer, or as
Goodman suggests, it was a low-muzzle velocity
projectile, likely a .50 caliber PCP round shot from
an air-rifle and possibly digitally synced with the
supersonic rifle shot fired further away that
functioned as a decoy to fit the cover story.
Diagram from
Jason Goodman’s Substack
As Alex Jones, along with a
number of other alternative media and citizen
experts, has opined, Charlie Kirk’s murder was a
professional hit. You don’t leave it up to a kid
with a screwdriver trying to assemble and
disassemble Grandpa’s WWI rifle to make the shot.
Assuming the guilty planners were the same ones
behind Butler, they likely wanted to be sure they
got their target this time. And what better way than
with a skilled sniper taking a relatively
close-range shot.
Through his
meticulous research forensically examining the
digital evidence, Goodman believes he has traced the
bullet itself through several frames of video,
moving in a line from behind Charlie toward the
right side of the back of his head. In fact, the
technology exists to link shots from two
different guns to fire at the same time through a
synchronous firing system that includes a
transmitter/receiver to communicate with the other
firearm(s).
CONSPIRACY CENTRAL
But let’s take a look at a few
other popular theories bouncing around the internet:
·
An
exploding lavalier mic inside Charlie’s shirt killed
him, not a bullet
·
It was a palm pistol shot
by Brian Harpole due to the “trigger-finger”
movement of his right hand at the moment the shot
rings out
·
Charlie’s team made
suspicious gestures just prior to the shot
implicating them in the plot
·
A man wearing black and
holding a large camera-gun behind Charlie shoots him
and then takes a few steps backwards before turning
around and heading out toward the parking lot
While I credit Jason Goodman’s
theory as the most compelling I’ve seen, considering
these theories, the one I find most plausible is the
last, as the location makes perfect sense and camera
guns exist, though I don’t know if they fire with
the velocity necessary to deliver the kill shot. But
there are also oddities and questions regarding
Charlie’s team’s actions which we’ll consider
shortly.
And I want to add a suspicious
occurrence to the list. Take a look at the fellow
wearing a white shirt in the photo below holding
what looks like a camera up to his eyes. Moments
later, when the shot is heard, his hands are
clenched together—possibly holding something—and he
jerks them up and down in perfect time with the
crack-boom. Not only that, but he makes the same
sort of movement with two hands that Brian Harpole,
on the opposite side of Charlie, makes with one hand
at the same exact moment, as the shot is heard.
Now I’m not saying either of
these two tried to shoot Kirk—but can it be
coincidental that they both seemed to mime that
gunshot exactly as it occurred? Why? What were they
doing? And how did they know there would be a shot
or the precise moment of its arrival?
Another point of interest:
TPUSA’s security head, Dan Flood, the man wearing
black who appeared to give an arm signal just prior
to the shot, and who is Brian Harpole’s associate in
his security company Rockhouse Integrity Group—was
also present, along with Harpole, at the rally in
Butler, Pennsylvania where Trump narrowly escaped an
assassin’s bullet. They were there to provide
security for Charlie Kirk at the Trump rally.
It’s a small world.
And speaking of similarities
between Butler and the Utah Valley University fatal
shooting, Jason Goodman, in reviewing enlarged video
of the airspace over the campus, discovered several
drones above the Utah campus, as he’d found in the
airspace over Butler on the day Trump was nearly
assassinated.
By now one thing is clear: the
similarities to Butler make this investigation a
national security issue.
A CLOSER LOOK AT TPUSA
SECURITY TEAM
Here’s a quote from Greg
Shaffer, founder of Shaffer’s Security, which
provided security for TPUSA for 7 or 8 years, till
the end of 2022:
The individuals who work for
that company [Integrity Security Solutions] were the
ones on the stage. Dan Flood headed up security for
Turning Point USA, and Brian Harpole is his best
friend. Brian worked for me for seven years, and
then Brian started his own company and then shorted
me on the contract for Turning Point USA. That’s how
they got the contract.
From Ken Silva of Headline USA:
“When asked whether he had a falling out with Flood
and Harpole, Shaffer said with a chuckle: ‘No, just
got stabbed in the back by some friends.’”
It’s also worthy of mention
that the website for Brian’s company, Integrity
Security Solutions, has been scrubbed. No more live
links.
Not great optics, guys.
MESDAMES ET MESSIEURS
Here at last is my speculation,
Poirot-style.
Mesdames et Messieurs: From the
first I was curious about the odd hand movements of
security team leader Brian Harpole facing the right
side of the stage and Mystery Suspect on the left
side. Both seemed to mimic the firing of a gun at
the moment when the shot was heard, yet neither
could have held such a weapon, and how would they
know such a shot would be fired at all, let alone at
that moment?
This brings us to the
possibility of a low-tech version of the crime.
Shortly before Hunter Kozak,
Charlie’s last questioner, came up to the podium,
TPUSA security head Dan Flood texted someone on his
phone. Innocent, perhaps. But suppose he texted
Kozak, instructing him to speak next. It must have
been prearranged for Hunter to ask a two-part
question to give the shooters time to ready
themselves for the shot.
Then comes the signals—possibly
one from Turek but almost certainly one from Flood.
Frank lifts and replaces his hat and touches his
face—innocent, perhaps. But Dan Flood gives a broad
arm signal exactly as Charlie speaks his last words
on this earth: “Counting or not counting gang
violence?” That was also the signal for Brian
Harpole and Mystery Suspect to make their
hand-trigger movements.
Why?
Because the sniper was on the
left side behind Charlie’s tent—the far left side as
you face the stage. From there, he couldn’t see
Harpole to know exactly when to fire, but he could
see Mystery Suspect. And Mystery Suspect could see
Harpole. So the signal was sent from Flood to
Harpole to Mystery Suspect to the sniper in split
second timing. And the man who fired the
high-powered rifle could presumably see both Flood
and Mystery Suspect from his distant vantage point.
Our killer may have been
holding a large camera gun and been near the back of
the tent, or may have been under the breezeway
further behind the tent, or may have been in the
parking lot, even in the hatchback van parked near
the tent as Jason Goodman speculates.
We don’t know his name, but
since we find an odd overlap involving both the
transgender community and TPUSA insiders, we’re
looking at an overarching plan larger than either
group, and can assume the highest level
orchestrators of this open-air public assassination
were not present at the Utah Valley University that
day.
CLOSING THOUGHTS
The proverbial lone wolf
shooter isn’t cutting it anymore. We the People need
all the facts of the conspiracy surrounding Charlie
Kirk’s death to be investigated and made public, and
for those involved to be charged, tried and
sentenced to the full extent of the law.
And that means both the
“hotblooded” conspiracy that emerged from the
transgender/Antifa community, and the possibility of
an overarching calculated, “coldblooded” conspiracy
perhaps shockingly even involving members of
Charlie’s own team.
But regardless of the findings,
we already know what entity was behind the hit on
Charlie: the MAGA-hating, America-hating radical
“Progressive” Left. And the motive? The takedown of
America by the One World Government elite globalist
cabal, along with their American allies—that’s you,
Dems—and assorted RINOs.
And let’s not forget the Deep
State.
It didn’t disappear when Trump
won the election. And then there’s the phenomenon
brilliant writer Joan Swirsky discusses in an
article in
News with Views: the metamorphosis that often
occurs once seemingly honorable men get positions in
D.C. The idealistic Jimmy Stewart types à la Mr.
Smith Goes to Washington, swiftly morph into
clones of corrupt politician Claude Rains. The Deep
State powermongers find ways to blackmail, threaten
or bribe them into compliance, which may be why
Conservative heroes Kash Patel and Dan Bongino seem
to be letting us down.
But one thing should now be
clear: Deep State elements in our own government
participated in, and likely orchestrated, the
conspiracy to assassinate Charlie Kirk.
Why else would our government be misleading
us and engaging in a coverup instead of seeking the
perpetrators and pursuing justice?
As Gary Bauer, president of
American Values,
opines, “The real threat to our Republic comes
from the totalitarian Left and its Deep State
allies.” Victor Davis Hanson says of Charlie Kirk’s
murder, “it was a political assassination.” And as
President Trump noted: “The gun may have been aimed
at Charlie, but the bullet was for all of us.” What
the Left and its Deep State allies have in their
crosshairs are the MAGA movement, Conservative
patriots, and We the People who love our country.
The enemy is within our gates.
https://cheriezaslawsky.substack.com/p/charlie-kirks-assassination-whodunit